Sunday, June 12, 2005
Original Views, a novel idea!
It is sad to think we have come so far, or slipped so low, that it is surprising when a Supreme Court justice considers the original intent of the Constitutional framers as not only relevant, but paramount. Is there a way to limit what the Supreme Court can look to for guidance in it's decision making process? If so, I would support limiting the Court to considering only the Constitution, and possibly contemporary documents of the founders, as relevant when deciding the Constitutionality of a case. Precedent, other countries law, and whim should not be allowed.
Thanks to Real Clear Politics for From Thomas, Original Views by Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post.
Thanks to Real Clear Politics for From Thomas, Original Views by Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post.
